Kevari v. Neven et al
Scott Allen Kevari |
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D. W. Neven |
2:2014cv01143 |
July 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Jennifer A. Dorsey |
Nancy J. Koppe |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Kevaris first-amended petition 15 is DENIED, and I decline to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 24 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's 23 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Petitioner's Reply is due on or before 1/21/16. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/13/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Filing 18 ORDER re 15 , Respondents shall respond to the first Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus within 60 days (9/7/2015) after entry of this Order. If respondents file an Answer, Petitioner shall have 60 days, thereafter, to file a reply. If respondents file a motion to dismiss, Petitioner shall have 45 days to respond to the motion to dismiss, and then respondents shall have 20 days to reply. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/6/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.