DeSilva v. Williams et al
| Marino DeSilva |
| Attorney General State of Nevada and Brian Williams, Sr. |
| 2:2014cv01195 |
| July 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| James C. Mahan |
| George Foley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER that this action dismissed in accordance with Local Rule LSR 2-2. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. FURTHER ORDERED that 10 Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/19/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER that the clerk of court shall file the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall add Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat the clerk shall electronically serve respondents with a copy of the petition and this order. In addition, the clerk shall return petitioner a copy of the petition. Respondents shall have 45 days from the date on which the petition was served to answer or otherwise respond to the petition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/17/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: petitioner and respondents as ordered - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
