Wits Basin Precious Minerals, Inc. v. Standard Metals Processing, Inc.
Plaintiff: Wits Basin Precious Minerals, Inc.
Defendant: Standard Metals Processing, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2014cv01459
Filed: September 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Carl W. Hoffman
Presiding Judge: Gloria M. Navarro
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' 43 Motion to Stay Discovery Dates and Deadlines. The parties are to file a Joint Status Report by 12/18/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/17/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
November 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER Granting 42 Motion to Withdraw Attorneys as to Defendant Standard Metals Processing, Inc. Defendant has until 12/1/2015 to advise the Court of the new counsel it retains. The Clerk of Court shall add the last known address for Defendant to the civil docket and serve a copy of this Order. Status Hearing set for 12/10/2015 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3C before Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. If notice of new counsel paperwork is filed prior to the hearing date the hearing will be vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/16/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
June 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER Granting 39 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Dates and Deadlines (Second Request). New deadlines: Motion to Amend Complaint: 8/24/2015; Interim Status Report: 9/23/2015; Initial Expert Disclosures: 9/25/2015; Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: 10/27/2015; Discovery cut-off: 12/7/2015; Dispositive Motions: 12/22/2015; Proposed Joint Pretrial Order: 1/22/2016; and Last day to Submit Stipulation or Motion to Modify or Extend Discovery Dates: 9/2/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/22/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
March 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Standard's 12 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' claims of breach of contract and anticipatory repudiation are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs' claim of interference with contract surv ives Standard's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' 16 Alternative Motion to File Second Amended Complaint is Denied. Standard's 5 and 10 Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction are Denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/13/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wits Basin Precious Minerals, Inc. v. Standard Metals Processing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Standard Metals Processing, Inc.
Represented By: Joshua D. Brinen
Represented By: Sean P. Flanagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wits Basin Precious Minerals, Inc.
Represented By: Deanna L Forbush
Represented By: Jocelyn Michele Shelton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?