Yax v. Caesars Operating Company, Inc., Harrah's Las Vegas

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Nevada District Court Yax v. Caesars Operating Company, Inc., Harrah's Las Vegas

Yax v. Caesars Operating Company, Inc., Harrah's Las Vegas

Plaintiff:	Eric Yax
Defendant:	Caesars Operating Company, Inc., Harrah's Las Vegas
Case Number:	2:2014cv01503
Filed:	September 16, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge:	Robert C. Jones
Presiding Judge:	George Foley
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 20, 2015	Filing 30 ORDER granting 29 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorney fees and costs. This court shall retain jurisdiction over any disputes arising out of the out-of-court resolution of this matter. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 2/19/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
December 18, 2014	Filing 21 ORDER granting 10 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint; granting in part as to the claim of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and the federal claim of Retaliation and denying in part as to all remaining claims Defendants' 8 Motion to Dismiss. The Court is willing to entertain a second motion to amend Plaintiffs complaint. However, such a motion must be properly filed within one week of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/18/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 20, 2015

Filing 30 ORDER granting 29 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorney fees and costs. This court shall retain jurisdiction over any disputes arising out of the out-of-court resolution of this matter. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 2/19/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

December 18, 2014

Filing 21 ORDER granting 10 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint; granting in part as to the claim of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and the federal claim of Retaliation and denying in part as to all remaining claims Defendants' 8 Motion to Dismiss. The Court is willing to entertain a second motion to amend Plaintiffs complaint. However, such a motion must be properly filed within one week of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/18/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yax v. Caesars Operating Company, Inc., Harrah's Las Vegas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Caesars Operating Company, Inc., Harrah's Las Vegas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Yax
Represented By:	Maile Lani Esteban-Trinidad
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?