Boyd v. Boyd et al
Nicki Boyd |
Lil Hone Boyd and Yvonne Lindsey Boyd |
2:2014cv01753 |
October 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Andrew P. Gordon |
Carl W. Hoffman |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 17 Judge Hoffman's report and recommendation is accepted and the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/1/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 14 ORDER Denying as moot 13 MOTION for Correction of Error as to the Thirty Day Extension of Time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must file her completed in forma pauperis application on or before 10/31/15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's failure to timely comply with this Order may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/1/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Filing 12 ORDER Granting 11 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff shall have until Thursday, July 9, 2015 to submit her completed application or, alternatively, to pay the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall retain Plaintiff's Complaint, but shall not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/16/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.