Fuller v. Williams et al
| Ralph Fuller |
| Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams |
| 2:2014cv01783 |
| October 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| James C. Mahan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice to the filing of a new petition in a new action.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send petitioner two copies of an in forma pauperis application form for a prisoner, one copy of the instructions for the same, two copies of a blank 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition form, and one copy of instructions for the same. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner may file a new petition in a new action, but he may not file fur ther documents in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Reasonable jurists would not find the dismissal of the improperly-commenced action without prejudice to be debatable or wrong. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/31/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc - copy of this order along with forms as instructed to petitioner - DKJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
