Adkisson v. Neven et al
Petitioner: Michael Dean Adkisson
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Case Number: 2:2014cv01934
Filed: November 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Andrew P. Gordon
Presiding Judge: Carl W. Hoffman
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER. It is there Ordered that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 28 is denied. It Is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court to substit ute Nethanjah Breitenbach for respondent D.W. Neven. It is further ordered that petitioner's motion for reconsideration 126 is denied. It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/28/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER Denying 109 Motion for Leave to File third amended petition. ORDER Denying 116 Motion for Leave to File a motion to order clerk to add exhibits. ORDER Denying 117 Motion for Order to Clerk to file second supplemental index of exhibits. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/30/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER granting 118 Motion to Extend Time Re: 109 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Petition. Responses due by 2/17/2022. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/16/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER Denying 101 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Claim and 102 Motion to Compel. The Court Further GRANTS nunc pro tunc 103 and 105 Motions to Extend Time. The Court Further Orders that respondents file a response to 109 Second MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Petition within 21 days. Petitioner may file a reply within 14 days of response filing. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/25/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) Modified text on 1/26/2022 (SLD).
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's motion to reopen case (ECF No. 94 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for petitioner's motion to withdraw (ECF No. 96 ) is GRANTED. The FPD is withdrawn as counsel of record for th is case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 30 days of the date of this order, petitioner file a motion for leave to file an amended petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner does not file a motion for leave to amend within 30 days, the second-amended petition will stand briefed and ready for a merits decision. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/20/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER Granting Petitioner's 82 Second Motion for Stay and Abeyance. This action is STAYED pending final resolution of the Petitioner's postconviction habeas petition. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action until a judge of this court orders it reopened. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/14/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
May 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER granting 84 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 82 Motion to Stay Case. Replies due by 5/30/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
February 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER Granting Petitioner's 77 Motion to Defer a Merits Decision on this Federal Habeas Petition. Within 60 days of the date of this order Adkisson shall file a status report regarding his state-court proceedings and whether he will seek a stay in this case. Petitioner's 73 Third Motion to Extend Time to File Supplemental Authorities is Granted nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER Granting 79 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time Re: 77 Motion to Stay Case. Petitioner's Replies due by 8/22/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
February 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER Granting Petitioner's 65 Motion to File Supplemental Reply Re: 60 Reply to 49 Answer. Petitioner shall file his supplemental reply within 30 days of the date of this order. Respondents' response due within 30 days of the date of service of the supplemental reply. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
July 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER Granting 55 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time (Third Request) to File a Reply to 49 Answer to Amended Habeas Petition. Reply due by 8/21/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
April 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER Granting 50 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Reply to Answer. (Replies due by 6/27/2017.) Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
February 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER that Respondents' 36 Motion to Dismiss is Denied. Respondents' 35 Motion to Extend Time to File a Response to the Petition is Granted nunc pro tunc. Petitioner's 43 , 44 First and Second Motions to Extend Time to Fi le the Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss are both Granted nunc pro tunc. Respondents have 45 days to file an answer to the 28 Amended Petition. Petitioner has 30 days after the date of service of the answer in which to file the reply in support of the petition. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
May 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER denying ECF No. 31 Motion for More Definite Statement; directing Respondents to answer ECF No. 28 Second Amended Petition as provided in ECF No. 14 Order; granting nunc pro tunc ECF Nos. 26 and 27 Motions to Extend Time. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/3/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
July 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER that Respondents shall enter a Notice of Appearance within 10 days of entry of this Order. Petitioner has 90 days from the date of this Order to file and serve on Respondents an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents have 30 days after service of the Amended Petition to answer. Petitioner has 30 days after service of the answer to file a reply. The parties shall send courtesy copies of all exhibits to the Reno Division of this court. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/6/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
June 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Granting Petitioner's 9 Motion to Lift Stay, 10 Motion to Reopen Case, and 11 Renewed Motion to Appoint Counsel. As the stay is lifted by this Order the Clerk shall reopen the file in this action. The Federal Public Defender i s appointed to represent Petitioner. The Clerk shall electronically serve the FPD and the Respondents a copy of this Order together with the 8 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The FDP shall have 30 days from the date of entry of this Order to file a Notice of Appearance or to indicate its inability to represent Petitioner in these proceedings. Respondents need take no action until further order by the court. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/29/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
April 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that the Clerk shall detach and file Petitioner's 1 -1, 1 -2 Federal Habeas Petition. Petitioner's 2 Motion for Issuance of Stay and Abeyance of the Federal Habeas Corpus proceeding is Granted. Petitioner's 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel is Denied without prejudice. This action is Stayed pending final resolution of petitioner's postconviction habeas petition. The grant of a stay is conditioned upon petitioner returning to federal court with a motion to reopen the case within 45 days of the issuance of the remittitur by the Supreme Court of Nevada. The Clerk shall administratively close this action until such time as the court grants a motion to reopen the matter. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/13/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adkisson v. Neven et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Dean Adkisson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D.W. Neven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?