Scher v. City of Las Vegas, NV et al
| Michael C. Scher |
| City of Las Vegas, NV, Carolyn Goodman, Brad Jerbic, Cynthia Leung and Mathew Walker |
| 2:2014cv02105 |
| December 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 40 the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 41 plaintiff Michael Scher's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Michael Scher may file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order, if sufficient facts exist. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Granting 5 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss 5 is granted. Mr. Schers claims against the City of Las Vegas, Carolyn Goodman, Brad Jerbic, Cynthia Leung, and Matthew Walk are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/29/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Granting 17 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/26/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
