Premier One Holdings, Inc. v. Federal National Mortgage Association, et al
| Premier One Holdings, Inc. |
| Federal National Mortgage Association, First American Trustee Servicing Solutions, LLC. and United Legal Services, Inc. |
| Federal Housing Finance Agency |
| Federal National Mortgage Association |
| Premier One Holdings, Inc. and Southern Terrace Homeowners Association |
| 2:2014cv02128 |
| December 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER Granting Fannie Mae and FHFA's 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary judgment is entered in favor of Fannie Mae and FHFA and against Plaintiff Premier One Holdings, Inc. as to the remaining claims and counterclaims in this case . The Clerk of the Court shall enter final judgment reflecting that all claims and counterclaims have been resolved in Fannie Mae and FHFA's favor. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/6/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER Granting 60 Stipulation to Dismiss Fannie Mae's Wrongful Foreclosure and Injunctive Relief Counterclaims wihtout prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/1/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERD that Fannie Mae and FHFA are granted summary judgment on Premier One's claims for quiet title. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/131/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 44 Stipulation extending the Reply deadline to 30 Motion for Summary Judgment to May 29, 2015. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/24/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Granting 38 Stipulation Extending time to reply to 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 4/14/2015. Replies due by 5/5/2015. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/25/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER. The discovery plan in this case is overdue. See Docket 28 . In light of that fact and in light of joint motions to stay discovery being filed in related cases, the Court set a discovery conference for February 25, 2015. See id. The Court hereby VACATES that hearing. Within seven days of the issuance of this order, the parties shall file either a proposed discovery plan or a request to stay discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/20/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER setting a discovery conference. Discovery Hearing set for 2/25/2015 04:45 PM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/17/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Granting 9 Motion to Intervene. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Proposed Intervenor Federal Housing Finance Agencys Motion to Intervene, Docket No. 9, is GRANTED. The Answer in Intervention shall be filed on the docket no later than January 21, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/14/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
