Aquino v. PNC Mortgage et al
| Luz Aquino |
| Clear Recon Corp. and PNC Mortgage |
| 2:2015cv00068 |
| January 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| George Foley |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of PNC Bank, N.A. against Luz Aquino. Plaintiff is to pay PNC the total sum of $7,936.76 by 1/11/16. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 12/10/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant, PNC Bank,N.A.'s Motion for Award of Attorney Fees 32 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is to pay PNC the total sum of $7,936.76. Plaintiff is further ordered to make payment to PNC by 1/11/16. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/9/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Granting 6 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/21/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 20 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 6/23/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER denying 9 , 10 Motion for Entry of Clerks Default. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/22/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
