Padan v. West Business Solutions, LLC
Tiffanie Padan |
West Business Solutions, LLC |
2:2015cv00394 |
March 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Carl W. Hoffman |
Gloria M. Navarro |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 146 ORDER that the Court approves the dismissal of this action with prejudice and this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/9/2018., Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 144 CLERK'S JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Tiffanie Padan against West Business Solutions, LLC. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 12/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 139 ORDER re Plaintiffs' 137 Unopposed Motion for Approval of Proposed Settlement, Incentive Award, Attorneys' Fees and Litigation Expenses, and Settlement Administration Expenses. Plaintiffs must file proposed findings and recommendations in compliance with Local Rule 7-2(f) by 8/14/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 132 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that by March 15, 2017, the parties must file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order or a joint status report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 03/01/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV) |
Filing 121 ORDER Granting 120 Second Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. The parties have agreed to confer again on 10/14/2016 and will file another status report with the court within 14 days of such conference. The parties agree that a further scheduling order may be necessary if mediation is unsuccessful. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/6/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 58 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Collective Action Certification. This action is conditionally certified as a representative collective action. Defendant shall identify all potential opt-in plaintiffs within 21 days from the filing date of this Order. Putative class members shall have 60 days from circulation of the notice of pendency to opt-in to this action. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/25/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Padan v. West Business Solutions, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tiffanie Padan | |
Represented By: | Bradley Scott Schrager |
Represented By: | Don Springmeyer |
Represented By: | Kevin J. Stoops |
Represented By: | Matthew L. Turner |
Represented By: | Jesse L. Young |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: West Business Solutions, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.