Bryant v. Neven et al
Petitioner: Christian Bryant
Respondent: Warden Dwight Neven and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Case Number: 2:2015cv00486
Filed: March 18, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Presiding Judge: Andrew P. Gordon
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER that 5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
February 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER that 7 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that, with respect to petitioner's unexhausted claims (Grounds I and III), petitioner shall have thirty (30) days to either: (1) inform this court in a sworn declara tion that he wishes to formally and forever abandon the unexhausted grounds for relief in his federal habeas petition and proceed on the exhausted grounds; OR (2) inform this court in a sworn declaration that he wishes to dismiss this petition withou t prejudice in order to return to state court to exhaust his unexhausted claims; OR (3) file a motion for a stay and abeyance, asking this court to hold his exhausted claims in abeyance while he returns to state court to exhaust his unexhausted claim s. If petitioner chooses to file a motion for a stay and abeyance, or seek other appropriate relief, respondents may respond to such motion as provided in Local Rule 7-2. FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to respond to this order within the time permitted, this case may be dismissed pursuant to Rose v. Lundy . Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
May 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Denying as moot Petitioner's 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall file the 1 -1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner's 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel is Denied. Respondents s hall file a response to the petition within 90 days of service. Petitioner shall have 30 days from service to file a reply. The hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits shall be forward to the staff attorneys in Reno. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/26/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryant v. Neven et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christian Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Dwight Neven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?