Garner v. The State of Nevada et al
Petitioner: Russell Lee Garner
Respondent: State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Case Number: 2:2015cv00516
Filed: March 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER that 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED on its merits, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment, in favor of respondents and against Garner, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/31/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
April 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER that 19 Respondents' Motion to File Answer One Day Late and 20 Petitioner's Motion to Extend Time to File a Reply to Respondents' Answer are both GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/28/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
October 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER that 8 and 9 Respondents' Motions to Extend Time are GRANTED. Respondents will have until November 16, 2015, to file their response to the petition. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/29/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that the clerk shall file and electronically serve the petition on the respondents. Respondents must file a response to the petition within 90 days of service of the petition. FURTHER ORDERED that 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/1/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
April 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date this order is ENTERED in which to have the $5.00 filing fee sent to the Clerk. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk is directed to RETAIN the petition but not file it at this time. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/23/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garner v. The State of Nevada et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Russell Lee Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brian Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?