Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| Alessi & Koenig, LLC, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and Town Center Village Community Association |
| 2:2015cv00577 |
| March 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER that by May 5, 2020, plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and cross claimant Town Center Village Community Association must either move for default judgment or voluntarily dismiss their claims against defendant Alessi & Koenig, LLC. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/16/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER granting 85 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice as to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, and Town Center Village Community Association; Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER Stipulation of Dismissal or Status Report due by 3/18/2020. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/3/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER Lifting Stay. Within 60 days of the date of this order, the parties shall meet and confer. Within ten days after the meet-and-confer, the parties shall file a proposed scheduling order. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/9/2019., Case stay lifted. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER granting 67 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney Steven T. Loizzi, Jr withdrawn from the case. ; ORDER granting 68 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney Steven T. Loizzi, Jr withdrawn from the case. ; The bankruptcy trustee shall have until August 31, 2018, to file a status report with the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Address pursuant to Order - JM) Modified on 8/2/2018 (JM).
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' motions for summary judgment 39 and 40 are DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED this case is administratively STAYED until the Ninth Circuit issues the mandate in Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, case number 15-15233 (2:13-cv-649-PMP-NJK). Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/18/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Granting 41 Stipulation re 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment and 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 4/18/2016. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/6/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 32 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer. Wells Fargo shall separately file the Amended Answer (which is attached hereto as Exhibit A) as a separate docket entry forthwith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 02/05/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER: The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Orderto the Attorney General for the State of Nevada, via certified mail, with return receipt requested. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/29/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: Attorney General via certified mail - DC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
