SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
| SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC |
| Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and Sandra Salas |
| Federal Home Loan Mortage Corporation and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC |
| SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC |
| 2:2015cv00806 |
| April 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER Granting 88 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/21/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER Granting 84 Motion to Excuse Parties from Requirement of Having all Counsel of Record Attend Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/22/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER RESETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE as set by 80 Order. Settlement documents are due by 11/12/2020. Settlement Conference is reset for 11/18/2020 at 09:30 AM by videoconference before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER Granting 81 Motion to Remove Attorney from Electronic Service List. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/31/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 61 the defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 64 the plaintiff's motion for sanctions is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/20/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER Granting 69 Motion to Remove Attorney from Electronic Service List. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/13/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 56 Motion to Lift Stay of Case; Within 60 days of the date of this order, parties shall meet and confer. Within 10 days after the meet-and-confer, the parties shall file a proposed scheduling order. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER Granting 50 Motion to Remove Attorney Allison R. Schmidt from Electronic Service List. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/19/2018.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER that 26 and 28 Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED this case is administratively STAYED until the Ninth Circuit issues the mandate in Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, case number 15-15233 (2:13-cv-649-PMP-NJK). Once the mandate issues, any party may move to lift the stay. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER that the party challenging Chapter 116's constitutionality in each of these cases must serve the Nevada Attorney General with the complaint, motion, or other filing that calls into question Chapter 116's constitutionality, and shall file proof of compliance within 10 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
