Bank of America, N.A. v. Cortez Heights Homeowners Association et al
| Bank of America, N.A. |
| Absolute Collection Services, LLC, Cortez Heights Homeowners Association and La Quinta Family Trust |
| 2:2016cv00604 |
| March 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
ORDER and FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court Grants the 126 Motion for Final Judgment Confirming Existence And Validity Of Deed Of Trust. See Order and Judgment for details. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/27/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER granting 124 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice as to Cortez Heights Homeowners Association. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/19/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER granting 107 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney - Shane D. Cox withdrawn from the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 6/2/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; Address from Exhibit A for ACS added to the docket and a copy of this order mailed to 6004 Chessington Avenue, Las Vegas, NV 89131- DRS)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER Re: 105 Order to Show Cause. Sanctions, including monetary sanctions and a recommendation for civil contempt, shall not be imposed on Shane D. Cox for his failure to comply with the Court's Order setting the settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 5/27/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 74 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Further Ordered: HOa's Renewed 76 Motion for Summary Judgment is Denied and Alvin Soriano's 83 Motion for Declaratory Judgment is also Denied. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/23/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER that Plaintiff's 39 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is Granted. The HOA's 45 Motion for Summary Judgment is Denied, Soriano's 46 Motion for Summary Judgment is Denied, Soriano's 40 Motion to Substitu te is Granted in part and Denied in part, and Soriano's 41 Motion to Extend Time is Granted nunc pro tunc. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER Granting 51 Stipulation to Extend Time to Reply re: 39 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Replies due by 1/5/2018.) and Respond re 45 Motion for Summary Judgment (Responses due by 1/5/2018.) Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER that this case is administratively STAYED pending exhaustion of all appeals of Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, No. 15-15233 (9th Cir. Aug. 12, 2016). All pending motions are Denied without prejudice with leave to refile within 21 days after the stay is lifted. Beginning on 4/19/2017 the parties must file a joint status report updating the Court on the status of this case every 180 days. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/20/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
