VanDeHey v. Real Social Dynamics, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Todd VanDeHey
Defendant: Owen Cook, Nicholas Kho and Real Social Dynamics, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2017cv02230
Filed: August 22, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Koppe
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER Granting 126 Stipulation to Extend Deadline for the Parties to Comply with May 3, 2024 Order (ECF No. 123). See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/10/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
March 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER granting 111 Motion to Confirm the Arbitration Award. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the stay on this case is LIFTED. And with good cause appearing and no reason to delay, the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining parties must appear in person for a status hearing on Tuesday, April 16th at 1:30 P.M. before U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey in Courtroom 6D of the Lloyd D. George Courthouse in Las Vegas, Nevada. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER granting 93 Status Report. Joint Status Report due by 9/15/2020 and every 90 days thereafter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/11/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
April 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file a joint status report or, to the extent appropriate, dismissal papers by 5/4/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/13/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
June 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER Granting in Part 77 Motion to Compel Arbitration, Denying 42 Motion for Summary Judgment as Moot, and Staying Case. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
March 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER Granting 85 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
December 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER that 59 Motion to Amend Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file the proposed second amended complaint on the docket by December 27, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
October 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting 28 Motion to Amend Complaint.; granting 32 Motion to Conduct Discovery. Plaintiff shall promptly seek discovery into the identities of the Doe Defendants, and shall file a motion to substitute the Doe Defendants with their actual identities within 90 days of the issuance of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
August 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: The undersigned will hear verbal argument on VanDeHey's motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction ECF Nos. 7 , 8 on September 8, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. in courtroom 6D. VanDeHey has until August 29, 2017, to ser ve the summonses and copies of the complaint, motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, and this order on the defendants. The defendants have until 5:00 p.m. on September 6, 2017, to file any response to the motions. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VanDeHey v. Real Social Dynamics, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Owen Cook
Represented By: Joseph A. Gutierrez
Represented By: Steven Knauss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nicholas Kho
Represented By: Joseph A. Gutierrez
Represented By: Steven Knauss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Real Social Dynamics, Inc.
Represented By: Joseph A. Gutierrez
Represented By: Steven Knauss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Todd VanDeHey
Represented By: Chris Ellis, Jr.
Represented By: McDonald Carano Wilson LLP
Represented By: Steven L. Procaccini
Represented By: Amanda C Yen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?