Young v. Williams et al
| Bernard Young |
| Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams |
| 2:2018cv00110 |
| January 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER.IT IS ORDERED that within 10 days of the date of entry of this order Respondents must file a redacted publicly available copy of the documents filed as ECF Nos. 12-2, 12-21, and 12-24, in compliance with LR IC 6-1(a)(3). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall seal the documents filed as ECF Nos. 12-2, 12-21, and 12-24. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/14/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER Granting 50 Motion to Extend Time re 47 Answer to Amended Habeas Petition (Second Request). Replies due by 6/21/2021. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/20/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER Granting 48 Motion to Extend Time re 47 Answer to Amended Habeas Petition (First Request). Replies due by 4/19/2021. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/17/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion to Dismiss; ORDERED that Respondents file an answer within 45 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/30/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Granting 43 Motion to Extend Time re 35 Motion to Dismiss (Second Request). Replies due by 5/27/2020. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/23/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Granting 41 Motion to Extend Time re 35 Motion to Dismiss (First Request). Replies due by 4/27/2020. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER Granting 36 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner has until 3/6/20, to oppose 35 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss his 33 Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Granting 28 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time re 27 Order (Second Request). Amended Petition due by 10/25/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/23/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Granting 26 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time re 22 Order (First Request). Amended Petition due by 8/26/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the FPD, through S. Alex Spelman, Esq., is appointed as counsel for petitioner pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that 11 the pending motion to dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner shall have until up to and including ninety days from entry of this order within which to file an amended petition and/or seek other appropriate relief. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/25/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Granting 16 Motion to Extend Time re 11 Motion to Dismiss. The deadline for opposing the respondents motion to dismiss is hereby STAYED and will be reset, if necessary, following appearance of counsel. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the FPD shall be provisionally appointed as counsel and shall have thirty (30) days to undertake direct representation of petitioner or to indicate to the Court the offices inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/24/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: CJA - MR)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall add Nevada Attorney General Adam P. Laxalt as attorney for respondents and informally electronically serve the Nevada Attorney General with a copy of 7 the amended petition and this order. IT IS FURTHE R ORDERED that petitioner's renewed request for appointment of counsel is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as the filing fee appears to have been paid twice, the Clerk of Court shall return $5.00 to petitioner. See Order for details/deadlines. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Finance - MR)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 1 petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file 1 -1 the petition, but petitioner must mail to the clerk for filing a n amended petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 3 petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice.The Clerk of Court shall SEND petitioner two copies of an in forma pauperis application form for incarcerated persons along with one copy of the instructions for same. The Clerk further shall send petitioner two copies of a noncapital § 2254 form along with one copy each of the instructions for the form and petitioner's original petition.See Order for details/deadlines. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
