Ramos v. CCDC et al
| Gustavo Ramos |
| Dr Williamson, CCDC and Dr Wade |
| 2:2019cv00124 |
| January 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 2/20/2019 before the Honorable Richard F. Boulware, II. Crtrm Administrator: Blanca Lenzi; Pla Counsel: Gustavo Ramos, Pro Se; Def Counsel: Robert Freeman, Esq.; Court Reporter: Patty Ganci; Time of Hearing: 3:16 PM - 3:40 PM; Courtroom: 7C.Pro Se Plaintiff Gustavo Ramos is present in custody. The Court makes preliminary statements and hears representations regarding the #2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. For the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED that #2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, following Plaintiff's upcoming appointment with Dr. DeBry, the Court receive a copy under seal of Dr. DeBry's report and a copy is provided to Plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that #3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is GRANTED. The case is REFERRED to the Pro Bono Pilot program for appointment of counsel. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BEL)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER to Produce Gustavo Ramos on 2/20/2019 at 3:00 PM in LV Courtroom 7C. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/11/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - copy placed in USM box - SLD)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/11/2019. IT IS ORDERED that a hearing regarding Plaintiff's #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order is set for February 20, 2019 at 3:00 PM in LV Courtroom 7C before Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BEL)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Gustavo Ramos. (SLD)
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM re #2 Motion for TRO/Injunction; filed by Plaintiff Gustavo Ramos. (SLD)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE to #4 Order, by Defendant CCDC. (Freeman, Robert)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE re #4 Order, filed by CCDC (Freeman, Robert)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court WILL SEND Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application. Payment of filing fees or completed application to proceed in forma pauperis due within in 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/25/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Re: #2 Motion for TRO. Clark County Detention Center shall file Plaintiff's medical records under seal by January 25, 2019. Responses due by 1/28/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/24/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: CCDC - JM)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, filed by Plaintiff Gustavo Ramos. (ADR)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, filed by Plaintiff Gustavo Ramos. (ADR)
|
|
Filing 1
RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (ADR)
|
|
Case assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (RT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
