Cooks v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| LaQuieta A. Cooks |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, TransUnion, LLC and Ocwen Loan Servicing |
| 2:2019cv01167 |
| July 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement between LaQuieta A. Cooks and TransUnion by LaQuieta A. Cooks. (Krieger, David) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint,, by Defendant TransUnion, LLC. Responses due by 9/2/2019. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Equifax Information Services, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Equifax, Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC added. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/26/2019.(Thompson, Jeremy) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 9
ORDER Granting #7 Motion to Extend Time Re: #1 Complaint. Equifax Information Services, LLC answer due 8/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 7/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #5 Motion to Extend Time Re: #1 Complaint. TransUnion, LLC answer due 8/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 7/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION STIPULATION for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Thompson, Jeremy) Modified event on 7/29/2019 (MMM). |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by TransUnion, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent TransUnion for TransUnion, LLC added. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendant TransUnion, LLC. (Bergh, Jennifer) Modified event on 7/29/2019 (MMM). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jennifer Rebecca Bergh on behalf of Defendant TransUnion, LLC. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (JM) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by LaQuieta A. Cooks. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5612588) by LaQuieta A. Cooks. Proof of service due by 10/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Equifax, #3 Summons Ocwen, #4 Summons TransUnion)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
