Foley v. Ashkenazi et al
| Plaintiff Jena Foley and Jena Foley |
| Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles LLC, Defendant SDI Technologies Inc, Defendant Aharon Ashkenazi, SDI Technologies Inc and Aharon Ashkenazi |
| 2:2019cv01829 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Richard F Boulware |
| P.I.: Other |
| 23 U.S.C. ยง 134 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of 26(f) Conference by Jena Foley. (Lunt, Brian) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Stipulation and Order Regarding NRCP 35 Examination of Plaintiff by Aharon Ashkenazi, Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles LLC, SDI Technologies Inc re #6 Order on Stipulation. (Lancaster, Amy) Modified text on 11/14/2019 (EDS). |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Aharon Ashkenazi, Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles LLC, SDI Technologies Inc. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Lancaster, Amy) |
| Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendants Aharon Ashkenazi, Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles LLC, SDI Technologies Inc. (Lancaster, Amy) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER with Jury Demand re #1 Petition for Removal filed by Aharon Ashkenazi, Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles LLC, SDI Technologies Inc. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 12/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Lancaster, Amy) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1. Attorney Anais M. Caccamo is in violation of Local Rule IC 2-1(a) and 2-1(d). You are required to register to file documents electronically in the Court's electronic filing system (CM/ECF) and the electronic service of pleadings and other papers. Please visit the Court's website to complete the registration for CM/ECF. (no image attached) (EDS) |
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #5 Stipulation re NRCP 35 Examination of Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 11/4/2019.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION re Discovery NRCP35 Examination of Plaintiff by Defendant SDI Technologies Inc. (Lancaster, Amy) |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant SDI Technologies Inc. (Lancaster, Amy) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/21/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 11/5/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 11/20/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-19-802575-C, (Filing fee $ 400) by SDI Technologies Inc, Aharon Ashkenazi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ADR) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (ADR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
