Carrillo v. Saul
Plaintiff: Anarosa Carrillo
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2021cv01130
Filed: June 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT 7009 0960 0000 4129 7769 for #6 Summons Issued as to USA. (MR)
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT 7009 0960 0000 4129 7752 for #6 Summons Issued as to USA (MR)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Allison Cheung on behalf of Defendant Andrew Saul. (Cheung, Allison)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed re #6 Summons Issued as to USA. AUSA served on 6/22/2021. (MR)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Certified Mail Receipts 7009 0960 0000 4129 7752 and 7009 0960 0000 4129 7769 for #6 Summons Issued as to USA re #5 Complaint. (MR)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General re #5 Complaint. (cc: USM w/ECFs #4 , #5 for USAO - MR)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul by Anarosa Carrillo. (MR)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court file #1 -1 the Complaint and serve the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration by sending a copy of the summons and Complaint by certified mail. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court issue summons to the US Attorney for the District of Nevada and deliver the summons and Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/17/2021.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (AF)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (AF)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Anarosa Carrillo. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kalagian, Marc)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Anarosa Carrillo. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Kalagian, Marc) Modified on 6/16/2021 (AF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carrillo v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Allison Cheung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anarosa Carrillo
Represented By: Marc V Kalagian
Represented By: Gerald Morris Welt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?