Sanguinetti v. Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.
Sara Sanguinetti, Raymond D. Speight and David Dietzel |
Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc. |
2:2021cv01768 |
September 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Daniel J Albregts |
Richard F Boulware |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney M. Anderson Berry on behalf of Plaintiff Raymond D. Speight. (Berry, M. Anderson) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Joseph Michael Langone on behalf of Plaintiffs David Dietzel, Sara Sanguinetti, Raymond D. Speight. (Langone, Joseph) |
Filing 21 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1. Attorney Joseph Michael Langone is in violation of Local Rule IC 2-1(a) and 2-1(d). You are required to register to file documents electronically in the Court's electronic filing system (CM/ECF) and the electronic service of pleadings and other papers. Please visit the Court's website to complete the registration for CM/ECF. (no image attached) (EDS) |
Filing 20 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Sara Sanguinetti, Raymond D. Speight. Adds new parties. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wise, David) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney David Hilton Wise on behalf of Plaintiff Sara Sanguinetti, Consol Plaintiff Raymond D. Speight. Appearance of Joseph Langone, Esq. Pro Hac Vice (Wise, David) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney David Hilton Wise on behalf of Plaintiff Sara Sanguinetti, Consol Plaintiff Raymond D. Speight. (Wise, David) |
Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/14/2021. On November 4, 2021, this Court GRANTED parties' #13 Stipulation and Order to Consolidate Cases. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that #10 Motion to Consolidate Cases is DENIED without prejudice as moot.For the reasons identified in the stipulation, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the #16 First Stipulation and Extension of Time re: #12 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's #12 MOTION to Dismiss is extended from November 9, 2021 to November 30, 2021; Defendant's Reply is extended from November 16, 2021 to December 21, 2021. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BEL) |
Filing 16 First STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #12 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Sara Sanguinetti. (Haines, George) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Gary M. Klinger on behalf of Consol Plaintiff Raymond D. Speight. (Klinger, Gary) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Stipulation to consolidate. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/4/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Stipulation And Order To Consolidate by Defendant Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.. (Kaveh, Mona) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.. Responses due by 11/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Kaveh, Mona) |
Filing 11 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.. (Kaveh, Mona) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Defendant Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.. Responses due by 11/3/2021. (Kaveh, Mona) Modified on 10/20/2021 (EDS). |
Filing 9 NOTICE Notice Of Related Cases by Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.. (Kaveh, Mona) |
Filing 8 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.. (Kaveh, Mona) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for #4 Minute Order Removal Case, by Defendant Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.. (Kaveh, Mona) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Stipulation; Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc. answer due 10/26/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 9/28/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc. (Kaveh, Mona) Modified on 9/28/2021 (EDS). |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/24/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 10/9/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 10/24/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kaveh, Mona) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number a-21-840040-c, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6642979) by Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (Kaveh, Mona) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.