Wong et al v. Las Vegas Sands Corp. et al
| Judy Wong and William S. Wong |
| Las Vegas Sands Corp., Venetian Casino Resort, LLC, LAS VEGAS SANDS, LLC d/b/a Venetian Resort Hotel Casino and Palazzo Resort Hotel Casino and Las Vegas Sands, LLC doing business as Venetian Resort Hotel Casino doing business as Palazzo Resort Hotel Casino |
| 2:2022cv00622 |
| April 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #6 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Manolo Olaso and approving Designation of Local Counsel as to Erick Ferran for Judy Wong. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/18/2022. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website #www.nvd.uscourts.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER Granting #5 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Johnny Lewis Griffin, III and approving Designation of Local Counsel as to Erick M. Ferran for Judy Wong. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/18/2022. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website #www.nvd.uscourts.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
|
|
Filing 8
EXHIBIT (California State Bar Certificate of Good Standing) to #6 Motion for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice - Verified Petition by Plaintiff Judy Wong. (Ferran, Erick)
|
|
Filing 7
EXHIBIT (California State Bar Certificate of Good Standing) to #5 Motion for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice - Verified Petition by Plaintiff Judy Wong. (Ferran, Erick)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Manolo Olaso and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Erick Ferran (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-6870517) by Plaintiff Judy Wong. (Ferran, Erick)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Johnny L. Griffin, III and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Erick Ferran (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-6870513) by Plaintiff Judy Wong. (Ferran, Erick)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS ISSUED as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (YAW)
|
|
Filing 3
ADVISORY LETTER to pro se litigant. (YAW)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (YAW)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-6867234) by Judy Wong, William S. Wong. Proof of service due by 7/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Ferran, Erick) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
