Martin v. Dominos Pizza
| Jarell Shabazz Martin |
| Corporation Dominos Pizza and Dominos Pizza |
| 2:2022cv00784 |
| May 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
|
|
Filing 3
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler will be the evaluating judge in this case. (no image attached) (KF)
|
|
Filing 2
ADVISORY LETTER and Consent for Electronic Service of Documents to litigant. (Attachments: #1 Consent for Electronic Service of Documents) (KF)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Dominos Pizza (Filing fee $402 - PAID) by Jarell Shabazz Martin. Proof of service due by 8/15/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 NVLAS081109) (KF)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (YAW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
