Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Downes et al
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
Mr. Daniel R. Downes, Mr. David M Downes, Ms. Colleen P Downes, Karen A. Macaulay, Bradley Randall and Christa D. Shedd |
2:2022cv00894 |
June 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Miranda M Du |
Brenda Weksler |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (SLD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-6928160) by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Proof of service due by 9/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Holmstrom, Kristina) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.