Hernandez v. Lowes Home Centers, LLC et al
| Oscar Hernandez |
| Lowes Home Centers, LLC, Ridge Tool Company and The Home Depot, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00938 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER denying without prejudice #23 Stipulation re Confidential Information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 8/5/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing 23
Joint STIPULATION and Order Regarding Confidential Information by Defendants Ridge Tool Company, The Home Depot, Inc.. (Bowman, Ellen) (other) (protective)
|
|
Filing 22
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 7/28/2022. By Judicial Assistant: E. Santiago. Pending before the Court is the Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. ECF No. 21. There is no caption on the first page indicating by whom this was filed. Further, the Case No. is incomplete. These are violations of LR IA 10-2. All future filings must comply with the Local Rules or they may be struck. The proposed plan by Plaintiff is exceedingly short, while the plan by Defendant is indefensibly long.Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 21) is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court adopts the presumptive 180 day period for fact discovery, measured from today's date, and the following discovery plan and scheduling order dates shall apply: Disclosures: Initial disclosures shall be made no later than August 10, 2022.Amended Pleadings: Pleadings may be amended and parties added no later than October 28, 2022.Expert Disclosures: Initial expert disclosures shall be made no later than November 28, 2022. Rebuttal expert disclosures shall be made no later than December 28, 2022.Discovery Cutoff: Fact discovery shall be completed no later than January 27, 2023. Fact discovery is permitted on all matters asserted in the Complaint and Answer.Dispositive Motions: The last day for filing dispositive motions shall be February 28, 2023.Joint Pretrial Order: The joint pretrial order shall be due no later than March 28, 2023, unless dispositive motions are pending on that date in which case the due date for the joint pretrial order is automatically extended to 30 days after a decision is issued on such motions.Any request to extend one or more of the above dates shall be made no later than January 6, 2023.Paragraphs 8, 9, and 10 of the Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 21) are adopted as if fully set forth herein. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ES)
|
|
Filing 21
Joint Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Oscar Hernandez.. (Sampson, David)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #19 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Rosario M Vignali for Ridge Tool Company and The Home Depot, Inc. and approving Designation of Local Counsel Ellen S. Bowman. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/14/2022. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing 19
MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Rosario M. Vignali and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Ellen S. Bowman (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-6972270) by Defendants Ridge Tool Company, The Home Depot, Inc.. by Defendants Ridge Tool Company, The Home Depot, Inc.. (Bowman, Ellen)
|
|
Filing 18
Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendants Ridge Tool Company, The Home Depot, Inc... (Bowman, Ellen)
|
|
Filing 17
ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint filed by Ridge Tool Company, The Home Depot, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 8/4/2022.(Bowman, Ellen) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 BY DEFENDANTS THE HOME DEPOT, INC. AND RIDGE TOOL COMPANY, SUED HEREIN AS 'RIGID TOOL COMPANY' by Ridge Tool Company, The Home Depot, Inc.. (Bowman, Ellen)
|
|
Filing 15
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendants Ridge Tool Company, The Home Depot, Inc.. (Bowman, Ellen)
|
|
Filing 14
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Ridge Tool Company, The Home Depot, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Bowman, Ellen)
|
|
Filing 13
JOINDER to #1 Petition for Removal,, by Defendant The Home Depot, Inc.. (Bowman, Ellen)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Ellen Bowman on behalf of Defendant The Home Depot, Inc.. (Bowman, Ellen)
|
|
Party Lowes Home Centers, LLC terminated per #11 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (KF)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Oscar Hernandez. (Sampson, David)
|
|
Filing 10
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ridge Tool Company by Oscar Hernandez. Adds and removes parties. (Sampson, David)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Ellen Bowman on behalf of Defendant Ridge Tool Company. (Bowman, Ellen)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #6 Certificate of Interested Parties by Plaintiff Oscar Hernandez. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Sampson, David)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #5 Jury Demand by Plaintiff Oscar Hernandez. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Sampson, David)
|
|
Filing 6
VIEW corrected image #8 re: CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Oscar Hernandez. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Sampson, David) Modified on 6/13/2022 (SLD).
|
|
Filing 5
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Plaintiff Oscar Hernandez. (Sampson, David)
|
|
Filing 4
STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Ridge Tool Company. (Attachments: #1 Index Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B) (Bowman, Ellen)
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/13/2022. Statement regarding removed action is due by 6/28/2022. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 7/13/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court Clark County, Nevada, Case Number A-22-851955-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-6937098) by Ridge Tool Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Index Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C) (Bowman, Ellen) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (DRS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
