Barao v. State of Nevada
Petitioner: Randy Barao
Respondent: State of Nevada and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Case Number: 2:2022cv01954
Filed: November 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A Dorsey
Referring Judge: Nancy J Koppe
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Deputy Attorney General on behalf of Respondents Attorney General of the State of Nevada, State of Nevada. Deputy Attorney General Aaron D. Ford-AG terminated. (Goebel, Geordan)
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Randy Barao. (LOE) (Main Document 5 replaced on 1/11/2023) (LOE). (Main Document 5 replaced on 1/11/2023) (Update Document - LOE).
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Service of the Petition. The Clerk is directed to FILE and ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition [ECF No. 1-1] on the respondents; and ADD Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General, as counsel for respondents and provide respondents an electronic copy of all items previously filed in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents must file a response to the petition within 90 days of service of the petition. Petitioner will then have 45 days from service of the answer, motion to dismiss, or other response to file a reply or opposition. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/6/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEF Regenerated for AG - LOE)
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RECEIPT of Payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 3-0096 (Habeas Corpus Filing Fee) (no image attached) (CJS)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against State of Nevada, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:22-cv-01954-JAD-NJK. (CJS)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Cover Letter re: filing fee) (CJS)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (CJS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barao v. State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Randy Barao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Nevada
Represented By: Aaron D. Ford-AG
Represented By: Geordan Goebel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Represented By: Aaron D. Ford-AG
Represented By: Geordan Goebel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?