Williams v. Bellagio Hotel & Casino
Berthinia S. Williams |
Bellagio Hotel & Casino |
2:2023cv00325 |
March 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Daniel J Albregts |
Jennifer A Dorsey |
James C Mahan |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/21/2023 denying #14 Motion to Set Aside Motion to Dismiss. In response to the defendant's motion to dismiss #10 , Plaintiff Berthinia Williams filed both an "Opposition" #12 (which is permitted by this court's procedural rules) and a "Set Aside Motion to Dismiss" #14 (which is not contemplated by the rules of this court). Because the rules of this court permit just one response to a motion to dismiss without leave of court, see Local Rule 7-2, and plaintiff has not demonstrated that the relief of "setting aside" this motion to dismiss is a proper procedure, IT IS ORDERED that the document entitled "Set Aside Motion to Dismiss" #14 is DENIED. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JAD) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Set Aside #10 Motion to Dismiss, by Plaintiff Berthinia S. Williams. Responses due by 5/3/2023. (KF) |
Filing 13 REPLY to Response to #10 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Bellagio Hotel & Casino. (Pettitt, Scott) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE to #10 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Berthinia S. Williams. Replies due by 3/27/2023. (KF) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/17/2023. Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to #10 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Bellagio Hotel & Casino. Responses due by 3/22/2023. (Pettitt, Scott) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 2:23-cv-00325-JAD-DJA. (no image attached) (EDS) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan, on March 3, 2023.With good cause appearing, Judge James C. Mahan recuses himself in this action. IT IS ORDERED that this action is referred to the clerk for random reassignment of this case for all further proceedings. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 7 ORDER setting Early Neutral Evaluation session. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 5/19/2023 at 10:00 AM in LV Chambers - Videoconference before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/2/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
Filing 6 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Bellagio Hotel & Casino.. (Pettitt, Scott) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Bellagio Hotel & Casino that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent IAC, Inc., Corporate Parent MGM Resorts International, Inc. for Bellagio Hotel & Casino added.. (Pettitt, Scott) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 3/1/2023. Statement regarding removed action is due by 3/16/2023. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 3/31/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe will be the evaluating judge in this case. (no image attached) (KF) |
Filing 2 NOTICE Notice to Plaintiff of Removal by Bellagio, LLC dba Bellagio Hotel & Casino re #1 Petition for Removal,.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Pettitt, Scott) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from 8th Judicial, Case Number A-22-860973-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-7221771) by Bellagio, LLC dba Bellagio Hotel & Casino. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Pettitt, Scott) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (KF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. Bellagio Hotel & Casino | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Berthinia S. Williams | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bellagio Hotel & Casino | |
Represented By: | Dana Howell |
Represented By: | Scott Pettitt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.