RODNEY L. EMIL V. JACQUELINE CRAWFORD, ET AL.
Case Number: 3:2000cv00654
Filed: December 13, 2000
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Kent J. Dawson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 22:2254

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 337 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Emil's fourth amended petition for writ of habeas corpus ECF No. 244 is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealabi lity is GRANTED as to the following issue: Whether this court erred in concluding that it must defer, under § 2254(d), to the Nevada Supreme Courts determination that Emil was not prejudiced by the States improper suppression of evidence related to Frederick Woodall. A certificate of appealability is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 4/10/2024., Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA)
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 295 ORDER that respondents' request for clarification 293 is GRANTED. Respondents' unopposed motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 294 ) is GRANTED. Respondents shall have until and including May 19, 2020, within whic h to file their Answer to Petitioner's Fourth Amended Petition (ECF No. 255 ). In all other respects, the schedule set forth in the scheduling order entered on January 6, 2017 (ECF No. 241 ), shall remain in effect. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 5/11/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW) Modified on 5/11/2020 (JRB).
October 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 250 ORDERED that petitioner's motion for stay and abeyance (ECF No. 247 ) and motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 249 ) are both DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 60 days from the date this order is entered to file a nd serve an answer or other response to the fourth amended petition (ECF No. 244 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule set forth in the scheduling order entered on January 6, 2017 (ECF No. 241 ), shall remain in effect. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 229 ORDERED that P's # 220 Motion to Stay is GRANTED. This action is STAYED, while P exhausts, in state court, all his unexhausted claims. FURTHER ORDERED that Rs' # 216 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice as moot. FURTHER ORD ERED that, on or before December 15, 2013, P shall file and serve a status report re status of state-court proceedings. Thereafter, P shall file such a status report every 6 months. Rs may, if necessary, file and serve a response to any such stat us report within 15 days after service. If necessary, P may reply within 15 days of the response. FURTHER ORDERED that, following the conclusion of P's state court proceedings, P shall, within 30 days, make a motion to lift the stay. FURTHER ORDERED that this action shall be subject to dismissal upon a motion by Rs if P does not comply with the time limits in this order. (See pdf order for specifics.) Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 11/15/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
November 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 228 ORDER granting 226 Motion to Unseal 205 Supplemental Briefing in Support of Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 11/12/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
July 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 206 ORDER granting 200 Motion for Substitution of Counsel. FPD for Dist of NV is discharged. FPD for Central Dist of CA appointed. FPD for Central Dist of CA shall, within 30 days, file Notice of Appearance, or other document indicating they cannot accept appointment. Requirements of LR IA 10-2 shall be waived. Clerk shall SERVE copy of this order as indicated. Service performed 7/12/12. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 7/12/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
September 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 185 ORDER granting 183 Motion to Substitute Party. Renee Baker substituted for E.K. McDaniel. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 9/14/11.(caption changed) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LG)
February 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 175 ORDER - Scheduling Order re status conference held on February 1, 2011 : Amended Petition due by 5/6/2011. ( see pdf order for additional deadlines and specifics ) Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 2/2/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
January 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 174 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's Motion to Vacate Stay and Reopen Habeas Corpus Proceedings 173 is GRANTED. The stay of this action is lifted. FURTHER ORDERED that a telephonic status conference is set for2/1/2011 at 9:00 a.m. to hear from counsel with respect to a schedule for further proceedings in this action. At the time set for the conference, counsel shall call the court at 702-868-4915 (at prompt, enter code 123456). To make other arrangements, counsel may contact Peggie Vannozzi, at 702-464-5429. (Case reopened and stay lifted.) (Telephonic Status Conference set for 2/1/2011 09:00 AM in LV before Judge Kent J. Dawson.) Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 1/11/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RODNEY L. EMIL V. JACQUELINE CRAWFORD, ET AL.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?