Kwon v. Benedetti et al
Ae H. Kwon |
Jim Benedetti and Howard Skolnik |
3:2008cv00307 |
June 3, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
Carson City |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Larry R. Hicks |
None |
Federal Question |
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that final judgment is entered in favor of respondents and against petitioners Kwon and Sung, dismissing these consolidated actions with prejudice. IT IS ORDERED that the petition of petitioner Kwon in No. 3:08 -cv-00307-LRH-VPC and the petition of petitioner Sung in No. 2:08-cv-917-LRH-VPC both shall be DENIED on the merits and that the consolidated actions shall be DISMISSED with prejudice. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED as to all claims. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 9/12/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) |
Filing 38 ORDER granting nunc pro tunc 36 petitioners' Motion to Extend Time to reply to the answer to 3 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. ( Replies due by 8/31/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/25/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Filing 35 ORDER granting nunc pro tunc 30 respondents' Motion to Extend Time to file the exhibits to 29 Answer to Complaint. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/17/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.