Croswell et al vs Union Pacific Railroad et al;
John S. Croswell, III and Linda C. Croswell |
M-I SWACO, Union Pacific Railroad Company, M-1 Drilling Fluids International Inc. and M-I LLC |
3:2008cv00445 |
August 15, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
P.I.: Other Office |
Lander |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Brian E. Sandoval |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
45:51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that D's 64 , 76 , and 77 Motions in Limine are GRANTED. Evidence of medical expenses that have been paid by UHC or D is excluded for the purpose of proving damages. Evidence of medical expenses that have not been paid by UHC or D is not excluded. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/30/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM) |
Filing 71 ORDERED Ps' 45 First Motion in Limine is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD Ps' 46 Second Motion in Limine is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD Ps' 47 Third Motion in Limine is DENIED. FURTHER ORD that Ds shall immediately provide Ps with the full surveil lance video Ds caused to be taken on May 5 and 6, 2010. FURTHER ORD Ps' 48 Fourth Motion in Limine is DENIED. FURTHER ORD Ps' 49 Fifth Motion in Limine is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Counsel shall not refer to opposing counsel& #039;s place of residence during argument, but may do so during voir dire. FURTHER ORD Ds' 50 Motions in Limine is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. FURTHER ORD Ds' first motion in limine is DENIED. FURTHER ORD Ds' second motion i n limine is DENIED. FURTHER ORD Ds' third motion in limine is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD Ds' fourth motion in limine is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD Ds' fifth motion in limine is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD Ds' sixth motion in limine is GRANTED. FU RTHER ORD Ds' seventh motion in limine is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD Ds' eighth motion in limine is GRANTED. ( see pdf order for all specifics ) Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/23/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) (Main Document 71 replaced on 6/25/2010) (DRM). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.