Conklin vs City of Reno, et al
Plaintiff: Laura Conklin
Defendant: City of Reno, Peter Rinaldo and Robert Mcdonald
Case Number: 3:2008cv00452
Filed: August 20, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
County: Washoe
Presiding Judge: Robert A. McQuaid
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER DISMISSING CASE regarding 77 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The parties hereby stipulate that this matter be dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/3/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
February 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 JUDGMENT - Ds' 49 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 2/8/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
February 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER GRANTING Ds' 49 Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/5/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
November 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER APPROVING nunc pro tunc 53 parties' Stipulation for defendants to reply re 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment. ( Replies due by 11/23/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/10/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
October 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER APPROVING 50 parties' Stipulation for an extension of time for Plaintiff to oppose 49 Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment. ( Response due by 10/28/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/2/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
February 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 PROTECTIVE ORDER re 27 Stipuated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. on 2/17/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conklin vs City of Reno, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Conklin
Represented By: Jeffrey A Dickerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Reno
Represented By: Donald L. Christensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Rinaldo
Represented By: Donald L. Christensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Mcdonald
Represented By: Donald L. Christensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?