Van Nort v. Fair et al
| Scottie Ray Van Nort |
| Glen Fair, Kenny Furlong and Clay Wall |
| 3:2009cv00042 |
| January 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Washoe |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDERED that the # 86 Report and Recommendation in case no. 3:09-cv-0042-LRH-WGC; #106 in case no. 3:09-cv-0109-LRH-WGC; and #44 in case no. 3:09-cv-0110, is adopted and accepted as follows: In 3:09-cv-00109, Doe defendants are DISMISSED witho ut prejudice; In 3:09-cv-00109, summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of defendant Hindelang as to Count 7; In 3:09-cv-00109, Counts 8 and 12 are DISMISSED without prejudice as the allegations contained therein are only directed toward Doe d efendants; In 3:09-cv-00109, summary judgment is GRANTED as to defendant Ramsey in Counts 13 and 14; and In 3:09-cv-00110, summary judgment is GRANTED as to defendant Ramsey in Count 5. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/10/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff's 69 Motion to Extend Time is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his opposition to Defendants' 62 Motion for Summary Judgment on or before Friday, October 21, 2011. TH ERE WILL BE NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS.; (2) Plaintiff's 70 Renewed Motion for the Issuance of Subpoenas is DENIED; (3) Plaintiff's 72 Motion to Enter Final Judgment is DENIED; and (4) Plaintiff's [73 ] Motion for Production of Transcripts Hearing is DENIED. The CLERK SHALL SEND a transcript request order form to Plaintiff for his use. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/29/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER - P's 36 Motion for Leave to Amend is DENIED;P's 41 Motion for Revision of Orders is DENIED; P's 42 Motion for Leave to Amend iS DENIED; P's 43 Motion for Leave to Amend is DENIED; P's 57 Motion to Extend Dis covery is DENIED except for the possible issuance of subpoenas (as specified herein); P's 46 Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas is DENIED without prejudice. P may renew his motion provided he does so by 9/7/2011, and submits: (1) a list of individuals to be subpoenaed; and (2) a showing that any discovery sought thereby is not obtainable from some other source. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr on 8/23/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 4/22/2011 before Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. Crtrm Administrator: Jennifer Cotter; Pla Counsel: Scottie Ray Van Nort, In Pro Per (telephonically); Def Counsel: Brent Kolve t and Kevin Pick; FTR #: 9:01:21 a.m. - 9:21:48 a.m.; Courtroom: 2. 28 Motion to Stay or Extend Time to Complete Discovery is GRANTED in accordance with the terms as set forth in the minutes. Discovery due by 7/22/2011; Dis positive Motions due by 8/22/2011; Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 9/22/2011. Case Nos. 3:09-cv-0109-RCJ-RAM (Van Nort v. Asher, et al.) and 3:09-cv-0110-RCJ-RAM (Van Nort v. Fair,et al.) shall be consolidated with Case No. 3:09-cv-0042-LRH -RAM (Van Nort v. Fair, et al.). The base number shall be 3:09-cv-0042-LRH-RAM and all further docketing shall be filed in the designated base case. Please see attached minutes for further details. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
