Sandoval v. Palmer et al
| Lawrence J. Sandoval |
| Jack Palmer, Nevada, State Of and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2009cv00081 |
| February 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Pershing |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Brian E. Sandoval |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER denying in its entirety 7 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly and close this case; denying a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/24/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that petitioners motion 20 to reopen is GRANTEDIN PART, to the extent that the Court lifts the stay and directs the Clerk of Court to REOPEN this matter. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioners second motion 21 for ap pointment of counsel is DENIED. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall informally electronically servea copy of this order and the petition 7 upon the Attorney General in the customary manner by adding Catherine Cortez Masto as counse l of record for respondents (Ackd). IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that, within sixty (60) days,respondents shall file a response to only the following claims in the petition 7 (See Order for specific claims). IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that, in any answer file d on the merits, respondents shall specifically cite to and address the applicable state court written decision and state court ecord materials, if any, regarding each claim within the response as to that claim.IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that, with any mo tion to dismiss or answer filed,respondents shall file copies of the state court record materials that are relevant and material to the procedural defenses asserted. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that any state court record exhibits filed by respondentshere in shall be filed with a separate index of exhibits. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from service ofthe answer, motion to dismiss, or other response to file a reply or opposition. The deadline established by this or der shall override any shorter deadline in a minute order issued pursuantto the Klingele decision. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/5/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) Modified on 7/5/2011 to reflect 7 Petition sent to Attorney General. (MLC).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
