Villanueva v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
| Isidro Villanueva |
| Nevada Attorney General and Nevada Department Of Corrections |
| 3:2010cv00225 |
| April 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDERED that P's # 23 Motion for voluntary dismissal is GRANTED and the petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) (Main Document 24 replaced on 4/9/2012) (DRM).
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Rs' 13 and 16 motions to dismiss are GRANTED, consistent with the remaining provisions set forth below. The Court holds that Grounds 1, 2(a), and 3 are not exhausted. FURTH ORD that P shall have 30 days from entry of this order w/in which to mail to the Clerk for filing a motion for dismissal w/out prejudice of the entire petition, for partial dismissal only of the exhausted claims, and/or for other appropriate relief. The entire petition will be dismissed w/out furth adv notice if P fails to do so timely. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
