Nissenbaum v. NAMCAM, L.L.C., a Nevada Limited Liability Company, d.b.a., THE CAL NEVA RESORT SPA & CASINO et al
| Susan B. Nissenbaum |
| SWB ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, CANPARTNERS REALTY HOLDING COMPANY IV, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company, BESHMADA, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company, SENTRY HOSPITALITY, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, SENTRY HOSPITALITY OF NEVADA, a Foreign Limited Liability Company, CANYON CAPITAL REALTY ADVISORS, a Nevada Corporation, John Harounian, Jim Henrie, William H. Jackson, Mark Magarity, Mike McBride, Michael E. McPherson, NAMCAL, L.L.C., a Nevada Limited Liability Company, NAMWEST, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, Ezri Namvar, Sean Namvar and Richard Bosworth |
| 3:2011cv00253 |
| April 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Labor: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 203 Equal Pay Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDERED that Nissenbaum's # 94 Motion to Vacate is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Nissenbaum's claims against Defendants NAMCAL and Sentry shall be DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants NAMCAL and Sentry and against Plaintiff Nissenbaum. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/6/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER granting the Canyon Entities' 69 Motion for Summary Judgment. The clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants Canyon Capital and Canpartners, and against Plaintiff Nissenbaum. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/22/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
53
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 5/22/2012. By Deputy Clerk: Katie Ogden. Re: The Parties' Joint Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order 49 . The Court rejects the proposed discovery plan/scheduling orde r as it is not in compliance withe LR 26-1. The parties shall file an Amended Joint Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.(Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 6/1/2012.) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDERED that P's motion for leave to amend (ref. # 18 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall re-file P's # 13 First Amended and Supplemental Complaint, effective this date. FURTHER ORDERED that Ds' # 5 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Ds' # 16 Motion to Strike is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/20/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
