Baymiller et al v. Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
| Mary Arlayne Baymiller, Scott A Baymiller and Kathleen Lynn Baymiller |
| Rite Aid Corporation, Teva Pharmaceutical USA, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Glaxosmithkline LLC, Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Aurobindo Pharma USA |
| 3:2011cv00858 |
| November 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER granting 59 Glaxosmithkline LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/6/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDERED that Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation's # 13 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot in part and GRANTED in part. The Court DENIES as moot Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.'s # 13 Motion to dismiss. The Court GRANT S Rite Aid Corporation's # 13 Motion to Dismiss ) in its entirety without leave to amend. FURTHER ORD that Ranbaxy Pharmaceutical Inc.'s # 31 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORD that CVS Pharmacy, Inc.'s # 33 , 34 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in its entirety without leave to amend. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
