Ritter v. Marshowski et al
Matthew Ritter |
Nick Galetie, Arron Hildreth, Arron Hughes, Mike Marshowski and Tyler Spring |
3:2012cv00194 |
April 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Larry R. Hicks |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER denying Defendants' ECF No. 45 Motion to Quash; denying as moot Plaintiff's ECF No. 49 Motion for Status of Served Defendants; denying Plaintiff's ECF No. 52 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Defendants' answers due 10/17/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 9/26/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 34 ORDER giving Plaintiff 30 days to file a Third Amended Complaint. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/4/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 30 ORDER - The # 29 Report and Recommendation is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff may PROCEED on the # 28 Amended complaint with claims specified herein. D Tyler Springs is DISMISSED from this action WITH PREJUDICE. Ds Elko and Elko County are DI SMISSED from this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE; however, Plaintiff is hereby given until 8/13/2015 to file a second amended complaint, marked "Second Amended Complaint" to cure the deficiencies noted in the # 29 Report and Recommendation with respect to Elko and Elko County. Plaintiff is NOT GIVEN leave to amend in any other respect. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/13/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 23 ORDERED that the # 18 Report and Recommendation is adopted and accepted as follows: (1) Plaintiff is permitted to PROCEED with his claims under the Fourteenth and Fourth Amendments for fabrication of evidence and malicious prosecution against defendant Marshowski; (2) Plaintiffs claims of false arrest and false imprisonment are DISMISSED with prejudice; (3) Plaintiffs claims under Fourteenth and Fourth Amendments for fabrication of evidence and malicious prosecution against defendants Hughes, Hildreth, Spring and Galeti are DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend; (4) Amended Complaint due by 3/27/2015; (5) The issue of service will be addressed once the deadline for filing the amended complaint runs, or Plaintiff files an amended complaint, whichever occurs first. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/24/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 4 ORDERED that the # 3 Report and Recommendation is adopted and accepted, and P's # 1 Application for leave to proceed IFP is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD the Clerk shall file the Complaint (doc. # 1 -1). FURTHER ORD this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.