Reberger v. Offender Management Division (OMD) et al
Plaintiff: Lance Reberger
Defendant: Offender Management Division (OMD) and Administrator Reed
Case Number: 3:2012cv00293
Filed: June 1, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER The Court certifies to Court of Appeals that appeal is not taken in good faith. Clerk shall forward notice to Court of Appeals with regard to this order (USCA served via NEF 1/8/13). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/7/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
November 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting 4 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 5 and 8 Motions to Raise Copy Credit Limit. Monthly payments due until full filing fee paid. Clerk shall send copy of this order to finance department and to Chief of Inmate Services (sent 11/30/12). This action DISMISSED as frivolous and for failure to state claim, with this dismissal counting as plaintiff's third "strike". Clerk shall enter final judgment accordingly, in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/29/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
June 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 1 is DENIED, without prejudice to his filing a new, fully completed application. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff, within thirty (30) days, shall either (1) pay the filing fee of $350.00 or (2) file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff does not comply with this Order, dismissal of this action may result. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall SEND plaintif f the approved form for the application to proceed in forma pauperis with instructions (SENT). FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall retain the complaint, but shall not file at this time.(Payment of filing fees due 7/12/2012. Notice of Compliance is due by 7/12/2012.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 6/11/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reberger v. Offender Management Division (OMD) et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Offender Management Division (OMD)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Administrator Reed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lance Reberger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?