Meisler v. Chrzanowski et al
Plaintiff: Michael Charles Meisler
Defendant: Nadine Chrzanowski, Karen Dustman, Ted Duzan, Mark B. Jackson, John Munoz, Ron Pierini, Laura J. Sperry, Sprint Communications, Inc., Janice Tebo and Vidovich
Case Number: 3:2012cv00487
Filed: September 11, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 80 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 10/16/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
August 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 60 Motion to Clarify. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 8/21/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
August 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 45 Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default; denying Plaintiff's 64 Motion to Compel the Entry of Default. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 8/6/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
April 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 4/15/2015, denying Plaintiff's 54 Ex Parte Motion Seeking the Court to Accept a Prepaid Telephone Call. The Plaintiff is directed to cease making telephone calls to Chambers as they will not be accepted. Plaintiff will be subject to sanctions if he continues this practice. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
April 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion : The component of Plaintiff's 50 Motion for enlargement to serve Dan Vidovich is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have up to and including June 23, 2015 to effect personal service upon Defendant Vidovich. The The second component of Plaintiff's 50 Motion re service by publication is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 4/10/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 3/20/2015. By Deputy Clerk: Katie Lynn Ogden. Plaintiff's 36 Motion Seeking the Issuance of a Subpoena Duces Tecum is DENIED for the reasons set forth in this court's order Doc. # 35 . IT IS SO ORDERED. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER DENYING # 32 Motion for subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/18/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER accepting and adopting 21 Report and Recommendation. Claims dismissed/allowed to proceed in accordance with attached order. Plaintiff advised that he must serve summons and copy of First Amended Complaint within 120 days. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/28/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE # 17 Motion to proceed IFP. Plaintiff may submit an up-to-date application demonstrating an inability to pay the costs associated with service of process. Plaintiff's # 18 Motion for an extension of time within which to file his amended complaint is GRANTED in that Plaintiff shall have up to and including Friday, December 13, 2013, to file his amended complaint. THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/30/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
September 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER adopting and accepting 14 Report and Recommendation. MOTION to Clarify and for Other Relief 8 is denied. Claims dismissed/allowed to proceed as noted in attached order. Plaintiff shall have 33 days to file amended complain t. Upon expiration of time to file amended complaint, Clerk is ordered to issue summons to remaining defendants. Please see attached for specific details. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/24/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meisler v. Chrzanowski et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nadine Chrzanowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karen Dustman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ted Duzan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark B. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Munoz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ron Pierini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laura J. Sperry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint Communications, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janice Tebo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vidovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Charles Meisler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?