Meredith v. Weilburg
Plaintiff: Natalie Meredith
Defendant: Douglas Weilburg
Counter Defendant: Natalie Meredith
Counter Claimant: Douglas Weilburg
Case Number: 3:2013cv00277
Filed: May 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting Defendant's 51 first Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 52 second Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/28/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
September 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER denying 18 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/29/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting 19 Motion to Extend Time re 18 MOTION to Dismiss; denying as moot 17 Motion for Entry of Clerks Default; and denying as moot 20 Motion to Strike. Defendants shall file response to 18 Motion to Dismiss within ten days. Plaintiff may file reply within seven days of filing of response. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/23/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
October 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting in full 9 Motion to Dismiss. The counterclaims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent infliction of emotional distress are dismissed, without leave to amend. The counterclaims for negligent misrepresentation and intentional misrepresentation are dismissed, with leave to amend within 20 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/15/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meredith v. Weilburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Natalie Meredith
Represented By: Christopher Brancart
Represented By: Ian E Silverberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natalie Meredith
Represented By: Christopher Brancart
Represented By: Ian E Silverberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Douglas Weilburg
Represented By: Mark Adrian Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas Weilburg
Represented By: Mark Adrian Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?