England v. Baca et al
William England |
Isidro Baca, F. Dreesen, James Stogner and Lisa Walsh |
3:2014cv00189 |
April 9, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Miranda M. Du |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER - The # 48 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted in full. Defendants' # 36 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/25/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 29 ORDER DENYING P's # 25 Motion to Compel. The component of Plaintiffs # 27 Motion which seeks an order for depositions is DENIED; to the extent Plaintiff's # 27 Motion may be interpreted as a request to extend the discovery deadline, Plaintiff's # 27 Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 4/28/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 16 ORDER IFP Application 1 is granted. Monthly payments due until full filing fee paid (copy of order sent via NEF to finance and via mail to NDOC). Clerk shall electronically serve copy of order and copy of complaint 4 on AG's Office (served via NEF 11/6/14). Within 21 days, AG's Office shall advise Court re acceptance of service. Answer for any represented defendants due within 60 days. Henceforth, Plaintiff shall serve upon defendants copy of all pleadings submitted to the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 11/6/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting nunc pro tunc 9 motion to extend 90 day stay, and vacating 8 order and the procedures, time tables and other requirements set forth therein. AG shall file supplemental status report by 11/5/2014. Clerk shall send copy of this order to Chief of Inmate Services (mailed 8/27/14; finance notified via NEF). Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 8/27/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Filing 8 ORDER Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 1 is granted. Plaintiff not required to pay initial installment. Monthly payments due until filing fee paid (copy of order sent via NEF to finance and via USPS to Chie f of Inmate Services 8/8/14). Clerk shall eserve copy of this order and complaint 4 on AG's Office (served via NEF 8/8/14). Within 21 days, AG's Office shall file notice advising Court re acceptance of service (see attached for details) . Answer for any represented defendants due within 60 days. Henceforth, Plaintiff shall serve upon defendants copies of all pleadings submitted. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 8/8/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Filing 5 ORDER RE: INFORMAL SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS - This case will not be referred for formal mediation. The parties are encouraged to engage in settlement discussions. Clerk shall provide Ds' counsel a courtesy copy this order and the complain t. (E-service 5/20/2014; # 4 Complaint via NEF regeneration.) If case settles the $350 filing fee need not be paid. If Parties unable to settle, then P will have to pay the $350 filing fee either immediately or from inmate trust account. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 5/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.