Green v. Baker et al
Daniel Green |
Renee Baker and Nevada Attorney General |
3:2014cv00450 |
August 27, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Miranda M. Du |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 5/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 33 ORDER - Respondents' # 13 motion to dismiss is granted in part. Grounds 1 and 3 are dismissed from this action. Further ordered that respondent's # 23 motion for leave to file exhibit in camera and under seal is granted. Further o rdered that respondents' # 31 motion to strike is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall strike petitioners additional grounds, arguments, and authorities (dkt. no. 30 ) from the docket. Further ordered that respondents shall have 45 days f rom the date of entry of this order to file and serve an answer. Petitioner shall have 45 days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/22/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 26 ORDER denying 6 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 7 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/17/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.