French v. LeGrand et al
Petitioner: Michael S. French
Respondent: Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2015cv00060
Filed: January 27, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Howard D. McKibben
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDERED that the petition (ECF No. 7 ) is DENIED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 3/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
August 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER denying ECF No. 13 Motion to Dismiss; directing Respondents to file their answer to the petition within 45 days. Petitioner to reply within 30 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/17/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
October 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDERED that # 10 Motion for clarification of order is GRANTED as set forth in this order. FURTHER ORD that the Clerk shall detach the petition in Case 3:15-cv-00059-HDM-VPC at ECF No. 1 -1 and FILE it in this case as a supplement to t he 7 Petition. FURTHER ORD that response to the 7 petition and 12 supplement due by 12/21/2015. Respondents and petitioner shall refer to this court's # 5 Order for specifics and for all other deadlines in this case. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/22/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
June 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Clerk shall file motion to consolidate 1 -3. Motion is granted. Clerk shall consolidate Case 3:15-cv-59 with the instant case and administratively close 3:15-cv-59. Clerk shall file this order in both cases. IFP Appli cation in 3:15-cv-59 is denied as moot. Clerk shall file and electronically serve petition on respondents. Response to petition due within 90 days (see attached for additional details and deadlines). Hard copy of any state court reco rd exhibits shall be forwarded to staff attorneys in Reno. Clerk shall file motion for appointment of counsel 1 -2. Motion is denied. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 6/1/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: French v. LeGrand et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael S. French
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert LeGrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?