Adorno v. Baca et al
Petitioner: Richard Adorno
Respondent: Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2015cv00160
Filed: March 16, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDERED that respondents' motion to dismiss the first-amended petition (ECF No. 15 ) is GRANTED. The petition is DISMISSED as untimely. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Respondents' first and second motions for extens ion of time (ECF Nos. 12 and 13 ) are both GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Petitioner's first and second motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 16 and 17 ) are both GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Petitioner's motion for leave to file exhibits under seal (ECF No. 37 ) is GRANTED. Respondents' motion for extension of time (ECF No. 38 ) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/15/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
June 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - Counsel for petitioner shall meet with P as soon as reasonably possible, if counsel has not already done so. FURTHER ORD P shall FILE and SERVE amended petition upon Rs by 10/1/2015. Answer due 60 days after service of amended petition. Repl y due 30 days thereafter. FURTHER ORD any state court exhibits shall be filed with an index as specified herein. FURTHER ORD parties shall send courtesy copies of all exhibits to Reno Staff Attorney. ( See pdf order for specifics. ) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/2/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
April 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED the Clerk DETACH and FILE the petition (# 1 -1). FURTHER ORD that the Clerk DETACH and FILE the motion for counsel (ECF # 1 -3). FURTHER ORD P's motion for appointment of counsel ( # 1 -3) is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD the FPD is appoin ted to represent P. FURTHER ORD that the Clerk shall E-SERVE the FPD this order, and the petition for WHC (#1-1). ( E-service to FPD on 4/29/2015. ) The FPD shall file notice of appearance by 5/29/2015. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/28/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 4/29/2015 to reflect copy mailed to P at NNCC on 4/29/2015 (DRM).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adorno v. Baca et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Adorno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Isidro Baca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?