Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a national banking association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a national banking association |
| Alessi & Koenig, LLC, Ironstone Homeowners' Association and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC |
| 3:2015cv00240 |
| April 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
ORDER granting ECF No. 145 Stipulation to Dismiss Defendant and Counterclaimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC With Prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/11/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER granting ECF No. 137 Notice of Bankruptcy Filing and Request to be Removed from CM/ECF List. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 4/22/2019. (Attorney Jeanette E. McPherson terminated for Shelley D. Krohn.) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 114 )is denied. The Court finds that the HOA Sale extinguished the DOT. It is further ordered that the HOA's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 115 ) isgranted. It is further ordered that SFR's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 116 ) isgranted. The Court finds that SFR owns the Property free and clear of the DOT. MarthaVazquez-Deperez has no further interest in the Property. It is further ordered t hat Plaintiff's lis pendens on the Property must be expunged. It is further ordered that SFR's second counterclaim for preliminary and permanentinjunction (ECF No. 16 at 12) is dismissed. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment in SFR, the HOA,and Alessi's favor in accordance with this order and close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER granting ECF No. 124 Stipulation for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC to File Reply to ECF No. 116 Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment. Reply due by 10/11/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
121
MINUTE ORDER : Steven Lozzi, Jr., Esq.'s motion to withdraw as counsel of record for Alessi & Koenig, LLC (ECF No. 109 / 110 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Mr. Lozzi may refile this motion upon obtaining and providing evidence of a lift stay order from the Bankruptcy Court for the specific purpose of withdrawing as counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 10/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER lifting temporary stay. Pending motions that were denied without prejudice when the stay was imposed may be refiled within 30 days. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER Staying Case Pending Issuance of Mandate in Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank and Denying Pending Motions without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/19/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER certifying to the AG that Plaintiff has drawn into question the constitutionality of NRS § 116.3116 et. seq. and directing Clerk to serve copy of this certification order on the NV AG. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/8/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
