Widmer v. Social Security
Plaintiff: Katherine Marie Widmer
Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 3:2022cv00432
Filed: September 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Michael Kramer Marriott on behalf of Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Marriott, Michael)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney David Priddy on behalf of Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Priddy, David)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER CONCERNING REVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. Defendant shall submit the administrative record, under seal, to CM/ECF within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the Answer. (See pdf order for additional contingent deadlines.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 9/26/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed re ECF No. #6 Summons Issued as to USA. USAO served on 9/26/2022. (HKL)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:22-cv-00432-CLB. (no image attached) (LE)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 9/26/2022. By Deputy Clerk: LE. With good cause appearing, the Honorable Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney recuses himself in this action. IT IS ORDERED that this action is referred to the Clerk for random reassignment of this case for all further proceedings. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LE)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner Of Social Security. (Issued and served via certified mail pursuant to ECF No. #4 Order.) (Service to AUSA (Reno) via email to USMS on 9/26/2022.) (DRM) .
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security by Katherine Marie Widmer. (Filed and served pursuant to ECF No. #4 Order.) (DRM)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - Plaintiff's IFP application (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED. The complaint shall PROCEED. The Clerk is instructed to FILE the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1). The Clerk shall ISSUE summonses and SERVE the Commissioner by mailing summons and complaint via certified mail to Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, and, Attorney General of United States as specified herein. (Cert Mail Nos. 7019 0140 0000 9995 1720, and 7019 0140 0000 9995 1737 respectively on 9/26/2022.) Clerk shall also ISSUE summons to the U.S. Attorney for District of Nevada deliver the summons and the complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service on U.S. Attorneys Office, Reno. (Email to USM on 9/26/2022.) Henceforth, P shall serve D or D's attorney a copy of every pleading submitted for consideration, together with a certificate of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 9/26/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (HKL)
September 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Case to Magistrate Judge. (Document restricted under General Order 2021-03.)
September 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Katherine Marie Widmer. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Taylor, Hal)
September 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal by Plaintiff Katherine Marie Widmer. (E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet CCS, #4 Summons USAG, #5 Summons OGC, #6 Summons USAO)(Taylor, Hal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Widmer v. Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katherine Marie Widmer
Represented By: Hal Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security
Represented By: Michael Kramer Marriott
Represented By: David Priddy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?