Wiggins v. Hatch et al
| Matthew Wiggins |
| T. Hatch, FNU Benninger, FNU Martin, FNU Montoya, H. Jaramillo, C. Trujillo, Z. Vandiver, K. Rivera, M. Jones, C. Frazier, D. Jackson, D. Gonzalez, H. Osorio, A. Lucero, John Doe and FNU Bobbio |
| 1:2021cv00670 |
| July 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Karen B Molzen |
| Kea W Riggs |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS RELIEF by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Plaintiff's #4 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs is DENIED. Plaintiff SHALL PREPAY the $402.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days from entry of this Order. (ve)
|
|
Filing 6
FINANCIAL ENTRY Account Statement by Matthew Wiggins (meq)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen to Cure Defects by 9/7/2021. (KBM)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Wiggins. (arp)
|
|
Filing 3
AMENDED 1983 PRISONER'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Matthew Wiggins. (arp)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen to Cure Defects by 8/23/2021. (am)
|
|
United States District Judge Kea W. Riggs and United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen assigned. (jg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
