APCO Building Specialties Co., Inc. v. NEI Contracting and Engineering Inc. et al

Defendant: NEI Contracting and Engineering Inc. and International Fidelity Insurance Company
Plaintiff: APCO Building Specialties Co., Inc.
Case Number: 2:2011cv01118
Filed: December 22, 2011
Court: New Mexico District Court
Office: Las Cruces Office
County: Dona Ana
Referring Judge: Carmen E. Garza
Presiding Judge: Lourdes A. Martinez
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 28:1352
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: APCO Building Specialties Co., Inc. v. NEI Contracting and Engineering Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEI Contracting and Engineering Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: International Fidelity Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: APCO Building Specialties Co., Inc.
Represented By: Stewart W. Forbes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.